<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Ratiocination</title><description>Being Divers Opinions, and Analysis of the News of the Day, with Reference to, and Informed by, Myriad Sources.</description><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1173</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8821150392911953808</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-30T11:05:43.192-08:00</atom:updated><title>Grand Orbital Party?</title><atom:summary type='text'>As the President gradually cranks up his rhetorical effort to recapture the "bipartisan" high ground, and Republicans obstruction is openly discussed, I'm hearing more and more of a particular counter-attack from Republicans, one that makes me wonder.Was a large part of the Republican party somewhere off-planet during most of 2009? This morning on NPR's Weekend Edition, Republican Senator Judd </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/grand-orbital-party.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-1084017444310974524</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-23T10:00:11.225-08:00</atom:updated><title>A Picture Worth A Thousand Words</title><atom:summary type='text'>From the talented Tom Toles.(Go see it there, so he earns his pittance from syndication. We need editorial cartoonists.)</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/picture-worth-thousand-words.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-6441896315523541745</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-21T19:14:47.877-08:00</atom:updated><title>Bush Wins!</title><atom:summary type='text'>I would be depressed about the radicals on the Supreme Court overturning a hundred years of precedent in order to fully convert our system to a corporatocracy, but I haven't finished being alternately depressed and incensed by the Democratic leadership rushing to shoot the Party dead in a ditch.I mean, in the long run, how much will the overturning of campaign financing law matter, when the party</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/bush-wins.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8629158540635630811</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-21T07:57:22.315-08:00</atom:updated><title>Priorities</title><atom:summary type='text'>Apparently, it is so important that we retain qualified Wall St. Banksters that almost nothing is being done to keep their firms from showering them with millions of dollars. And, when new White House rules would have kept one of those banksters out of a Cabinet post, and from bringing another along to work for him, something was done about it. It's very important to get and keep good banksters, </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/priorities.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-4878537139752869585</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-20T07:31:54.871-08:00</atom:updated><title>Another Take</title><atom:summary type='text'>All over the airwaves are people telling you what the "message" of the Scott Brown election is. Here's an opinion you probably won't hear. The "message" is that in the real world voters don't care about 'bipartisanship' or 'collegiality' or any other DC nicety. They care about results. If there has been a 'failure' in the Obama administration, it was spending far, far too much time courting </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/another-take.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8562084891634995983</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-20T07:17:11.848-08:00</atom:updated><title>Now What?</title><atom:summary type='text'>What Jonathan Cohn says.</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/now-what.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-305057347553677725</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-19T07:52:19.061-08:00</atom:updated><title>Saw This One Coming</title><atom:summary type='text'>Washington Post:The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist or simply persuading phone companies to provide records, according to internal bureau memos and interviews. FBI officials issued approvals after the fact to justify their actions. Heckuva job, Bushie.</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2010/01/saw-this-one-coming.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-5044683002529419172</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-25T08:05:27.611-08:00</atom:updated><title>Um, ....?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Former White House spokeswoman Dana Perino was on Fox News' Hannity show, and said"We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term"No, really. She said that.Neither of the two other people on the set, including Hannity, appeared to notice.Ironically, the comment came in a discussion implying that the Obama administration was in denial about the terrorist nature of </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/11/um.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-4975336059611385023</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-19T23:13:47.090-08:00</atom:updated><title>So Explain To Me Again</title><atom:summary type='text'>...why a single-payer national health care plan was never a part of this year's reform discussions? I wonder what the Senate bill has to say about situations like this one.SEATTLE (AP) — Seattle's Swedish Medical Center says it might stop accepting Regence BlueShield — the region's biggest health insurer — as a provider because its reimbursement rates are too low.Regence said in a news release </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/11/so-explain-to-me-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-2219638475886160337</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-19T18:11:41.618-08:00</atom:updated><title>The Stupid, It Burns.</title><atom:summary type='text'>The girl is young enough to have an excuse (though someone as smart as she is should be able to see through that rhetoric), but the guy...ow. I can only hope he's too dumb to get himself legally registered to vote.</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/11/stupid-it-burns.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-4277843589388668811</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-01T09:33:43.725-08:00</atom:updated><title>On Grayson</title><atom:summary type='text'>The New York Times has a piece on the rise of freshman Congressman Allan Grayson, in a piece entitled "Alan Grayson, the Liberals’ Problem Child". (No, seriously, that's what they called him.)WASHINGTON — On paper, Representative Alan Grayson, a freshman Democrat from Florida, seems a bit stiff: degrees from Harvard and Harvard Law; a résumé that includes clerking for the United States Court of </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/11/on-grayson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-5290677270657745687</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-27T18:38:08.643-07:00</atom:updated><title>So, I'm Thinking...</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm thinking that Ned Lamont wouldn't be talking about filibustering a key Democratic objective.Say, Harry, wasn't it you who said Joe was with us on everything but the war?Just in case you thought Joltin' Joe wasn't serious, read his health-care rap sheet as compiled by the folks at My Left Nutmeg.Barack, I'm lookin' at you. You stood by him, you endorsed him, you talked about how much "he cares</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/10/so-im-thinking.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-1049812508421993360</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-23T18:47:20.910-07:00</atom:updated><title>My Kind of Crazy</title><atom:summary type='text'>Grayson uses the "over-the-top excess" rhetorical tactic to good effect, and blows Chris Matthews' mind. A two-fer!</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/10/my-kind-of-crazy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-2191164142782548362</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-14T07:43:43.819-07:00</atom:updated><title>Media Criticism</title><atom:summary type='text'>Why is it that some of the best media criticism in our media-rich country comes from a comedy show on a basic cable channel?The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10cCNN Leaves It Therewww.thedailyshow.comDaily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorRon Paul Interview</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/10/media-criticism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-3155917987948620627</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-22T17:54:09.391-07:00</atom:updated><title>An Important Public Service Announcement</title><atom:summary type='text'>Protect Insurance Companies PSA from Will Ferrell</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/09/important-public-service-announcement.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-3762207367193003075</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-18T08:00:26.761-07:00</atom:updated><title>Another Thing</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm not really interested in defending ACORN, but the sanctimony of their enemies really irks me.If we're going to start denying funding to organizations that screw up, fine. And if John Boehner wants to rant about corrupt organizations, he should go right ahead. But, unless I missed a story I'm pretty sure the GOP wouldn't have let me miss, ACORN hasn't electrocuted anyone or shot up a public </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/09/another-thing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8205592495252649112</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-17T08:15:38.989-07:00</atom:updated><title>Wait, I'm Confused.</title><atom:summary type='text'>So, a low-level staffer of a national community organization in a low-income urban neighborhood was filmed giving advice to a woman about how she could continue to make a living as a prostitute (for which said staffer has already been canned) and that's supposed to be the most heinous news in weeks and the pretext for denying unrelated government grants to the organization. But meanwhile a </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/09/wait-im-confused.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8751486241699167985</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-10T19:10:47.891-07:00</atom:updated><title>Just A Thought...</title><atom:summary type='text'>Now that Congressman Wilson of South Carolina has apologized for violating the rules of decorum in the House of Representatives, to say nothing of embarrassing himself and his party by being completely wrong in the facts as well as the form of his accusation, the question comes what consequences he should face.I think we should let the Dixie Chicks decide.</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/09/just-thought.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-732844566383585763</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-27T20:59:24.975-07:00</atom:updated><title>The State of Our Discourse</title><atom:summary type='text'>Captured perfectly by the Onion News Network. Laugh to keep from crying.Is Using A Minotaur To Gore Detainees A Form Of Torture?</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/08/state-of-our-discourse.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-1983950582615808570</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-26T07:15:27.644-07:00</atom:updated><title>Rest In Peace</title><atom:summary type='text'>The work goes on.The cause endures.The hope still lives.And the dream shall never die.You are already missed."Yes, we are all Americans.This is what we do.We reach the Moon.We scale the heights.I know it.I've seen it.I've lived it.And we can do it again!"</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/08/rest-in-peace.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-2218040224405760825</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-19T07:58:01.524-07:00</atom:updated><title>Another Reason to Like Barney Frank</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/08/another-reason-to-like-barney-frank.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-2346160885474737367</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-11T09:10:22.326-07:00</atom:updated><title>Dear NPR</title><atom:summary type='text'>Dear NPR editors:When one side shows up to an event with the express intent of "shutting it down", engages in rhythmic chanting to drown out the attempt to exchange information, and repeats slanderous and completely false allegations, that is not "heated debate." Democratic congresspeople have not met "heated debate" at their town hall meetings. They have met a concerted attempt to disrupt and </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/08/dear-npr.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-8536714887703118211</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-20T13:26:25.086-07:00</atom:updated><title>Jim DeMint Hit Parade</title><atom:summary type='text'>Over the weekend, it became clear that some Republicans just want to obstruct health insurance reform for political reasons.On Friday, on a "Conservatives for Patients Rights" conference call with conservative activists dealing with health care reform, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said, as Ben Smith at Politico reported, "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him</atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/07/jim-demint-hit-parade.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-7193072935584719696</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-07T08:01:44.595-07:00</atom:updated><title>Good Riddance</title><atom:summary type='text'>I think there should be some kind of way to penalize the Republican Party for nominating this woman for Vice President. They should, like, lose a turn and have to sit out an election, or something. Remember, if they'd had their way, she would be the Vice President now.But as for whether another pursuit of national office, as she did less than a year ago when she joined Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/07/good-riddance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8077154.post-7886142203533086848</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-26T17:43:43.852-07:00</atom:updated><title>Forgive Me</title><atom:summary type='text'>My personal preoccupations of the early 80s apparently left me permanently out of sync with the rest of the world in some ways, and I never fell under the spell of the Thriller album. The most recent Michael Jackson song I really enjoy listening to these days is Never Can Say Goodbye, though the love song to the homicidal rat Ben always gets a laugh. For at least the last decade, Michael Jackson </atom:summary><link>http://nosmallplans.com/rants/2009/06/forgive-me.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Paul)</author></item></channel></rss>